Following the phenomenal success of the re-launch of Conservatory Outlet’s main website last year, the company has once again turned to Motionlab for help.
The UK’s number one home improvement specialists asked the North West’s leading digital agency if we could create a separate site solely dedicated to their comprehensive window and door range. The intention being that the new domain www.doubleglazingoutlet.co.uk will help them capture a bigger proportion of online leads and sales for windows and doors.
Our web designers have ensured that branding remains consistent with the company’s other websites when taking the emphasis away from conservatories and orangeries. Products such as energy rated windows and composite doors are now given more prominence.
Conservatory Outlet is also particularly keen to push triple glazing on the new website as they look to raise awareness of its availability amongst homeowners. With this in mind, we have created a page devoted to this most energy efficient of products.
Thanks to the excellent work of our SEO team, if you currently do a Google search for the words ‘conservatory’ and ‘conservatories’ you will find that Conservatory Outlet’s main site ranks number one in the natural listings for both words.
To help capitalise on this, efforts will now be made by our SEO experts on making doubleglazingoutlet.co.uk equally as visible when homeowners search online for replacement windows and doors.
If you have a particular product or service that deserves increased attention, give Motionlab a call on 01772 865050.









Choosing a SEO Keyword Tracker – SEOmoz vs. Raven vs. WebCEO
Tuesday, March 15th, 2011Now before you say ‘Why are you obsessed with keyword rankings?’ I’m not! But in my opinion tracking keyword positions is still an important part of understanding how your SEO campaign is performing.
With this in mind, I set about doing a simple test for one of our clients campaigns. I compared three different keyword trackers from SEOmoz, Raven & WebCEO, to find out which tool was the most accurate for a single set of keywords against my own manually checked results.
I decided not to go down the route of testing thousands of keywords as I simply don’t have the time, so this review is merely using sample data. It should also be noted that my own manually checked results will only represent those from a single Google data centre, so results may vary.
The Tools:
SEOmoz Pro ($99 Per Month for 250 Keywords)
Raven Pro ($99 Per Month for 1,000 Keywords)
WebCEO ($49 Per Month for Unlimited Keywords)
(Prices are listed in dollars as the exchange rate is obviously variable)
The Facts:
Search Engine: Google.co.uk
Keywords Tested: 14
Date Tested: 10/03/2011
Industry: Solar Panels (I can’t disclose the keywords used due to client privacy)
Scoring
Comparing against my manually checked results, each tool was awarded points for the following rates of accuracy for each keyword.
3 Points: Within 1 Position +/-
2 Points: Within 3 Positions +/-
1 Point: Within 4-10 Positions +/-
-1 Point: More than 10 Positions +/-
The Results
1st Place with 36 Points was SEOmoz
2nd Place with 30 Points was WebCEO
3rd Place with 26 Points was Raven
Breakdown of Points
SEOmoz:
10 Keywords within 1 position (30 Points)
2 Keywords within 3 positions (4 Points)
2 Keywords with 4-6 Positions (2 Points)
0 Keywords within 10+ Positions (0 Points)
WebCEO:
7 Keywords within 1 position (21 Points)
4 Keywords within 3 positions (8 Points)
2 Keywords with 4-6 Positions (2 Points)
1 Keywords within 10+ Positions (-1 Point)
Raven:
6 Keywords within 1 position (18 Points)
2 Keywords within 3 positions (4 Points)
5 Keywords with 4-6 Positions (5 Points)
1 Keywords within 10+ Positions (-1 Points)
Summary
SEOmoz Pro
If you’re looking for a complete SEO tools set, SEOmoz offers good value with the highest points for accuracy, an average cost per accuracy point of $2.75. However, it must be noted that you are limited to tracking only 250 Keywords.
WebCEO
If you’re just looking for a good keyword tracking tool that doesn’t cost the earth, then WebCEO at $49/£30 pm is the cheapest with an average cost per accuracy point of ($1.63). Although, the wider tool set doesn’t match that of its competitors.
Raven Pro SEO Tools
Surprisingly given its monthly cost, Raven had the lowest points for accuracy with 26 points. It is the weakest of the three tools we tested with an average cost per accuracy point of $3.80 making it the most expensive for accuracy. Although Raven also have a very strong set of link building tools which Shark SEO has reviewed. Finally It should be noted though that although more expensive per point, Raven allows the tracking of 1,000 keywords compared to SEOmoz’s 250.
Posted in Google, Industry Comment, Knowledge Base, Marketing, SEO | No Comments »