A unique product deserves a unique marketing concept. When Conservatory Outlet informed us that they would be introducing triple glazing to their product range, one of the biggest innovations in the home improvement market in recent years, we informed them that solely advertising it on their existing website simply wasn’t enough.
We instead insisted that it should be promoted in the most remarkable way possible on its own dedicated site and thankfully Conservatory Outlet agreed!
Not only that, but we also came up with the quirky idea of the product being endorsed by three superheroes, ‘Flash Carbon, ‘Solar Lola’ and Weatherman’, who have arrived on Planet Earth to help people save money, save energy and the planet. We swear we haven’t gone mad!
The new site www.tripleglazingsuperheroes.com gives online visitors a comprehensive insight into triple glazing in the most personable way possible.
Sitting alongside cartoon imagery shaped by our graphic designers, all content included throughout the site is written from the perspective of the three Superheroes. It details how homeowners can save money on energy and do their bit for the environment by replacing their existing windows for triple glazing.
One of the most prominent features on the site is the blog area where the Triple Glazing Heroes will keep users regularly informed of any relevant industry developments and news relating to triple glazing and associated products.
Navigational aspects have also been taken care of with the introduction of clickable tabs across each individual page so that home improvement enthusiasts can easily gain a better understanding of this most revolutionary creation.
We believe that the Triple Glazing Superheroes will create the intrigue and business from consumers that this ground-breaking product deserves.




Choosing a SEO Keyword Tracker – SEOmoz vs. Raven vs. WebCEO
Tuesday, March 15th, 2011Now before you say ‘Why are you obsessed with keyword rankings?’ I’m not! But in my opinion tracking keyword positions is still an important part of understanding how your SEO campaign is performing.
With this in mind, I set about doing a simple test for one of our clients campaigns. I compared three different keyword trackers from SEOmoz, Raven & WebCEO, to find out which tool was the most accurate for a single set of keywords against my own manually checked results.
I decided not to go down the route of testing thousands of keywords as I simply don’t have the time, so this review is merely using sample data. It should also be noted that my own manually checked results will only represent those from a single Google data centre, so results may vary.
The Tools:
SEOmoz Pro ($99 Per Month for 250 Keywords)
Raven Pro ($99 Per Month for 1,000 Keywords)
WebCEO ($49 Per Month for Unlimited Keywords)
(Prices are listed in dollars as the exchange rate is obviously variable)
The Facts:
Search Engine: Google.co.uk
Keywords Tested: 14
Date Tested: 10/03/2011
Industry: Solar Panels (I can’t disclose the keywords used due to client privacy)
Scoring
Comparing against my manually checked results, each tool was awarded points for the following rates of accuracy for each keyword.
3 Points: Within 1 Position +/-
2 Points: Within 3 Positions +/-
1 Point: Within 4-10 Positions +/-
-1 Point: More than 10 Positions +/-
The Results
1st Place with 36 Points was SEOmoz
2nd Place with 30 Points was WebCEO
3rd Place with 26 Points was Raven
Breakdown of Points
SEOmoz:
10 Keywords within 1 position (30 Points)
2 Keywords within 3 positions (4 Points)
2 Keywords with 4-6 Positions (2 Points)
0 Keywords within 10+ Positions (0 Points)
WebCEO:
7 Keywords within 1 position (21 Points)
4 Keywords within 3 positions (8 Points)
2 Keywords with 4-6 Positions (2 Points)
1 Keywords within 10+ Positions (-1 Point)
Raven:
6 Keywords within 1 position (18 Points)
2 Keywords within 3 positions (4 Points)
5 Keywords with 4-6 Positions (5 Points)
1 Keywords within 10+ Positions (-1 Points)
Summary
SEOmoz Pro
If you’re looking for a complete SEO tools set, SEOmoz offers good value with the highest points for accuracy, an average cost per accuracy point of $2.75. However, it must be noted that you are limited to tracking only 250 Keywords.
WebCEO
If you’re just looking for a good keyword tracking tool that doesn’t cost the earth, then WebCEO at $49/£30 pm is the cheapest with an average cost per accuracy point of ($1.63). Although, the wider tool set doesn’t match that of its competitors.
Raven Pro SEO Tools
Surprisingly given its monthly cost, Raven had the lowest points for accuracy with 26 points. It is the weakest of the three tools we tested with an average cost per accuracy point of $3.80 making it the most expensive for accuracy. Although Raven also have a very strong set of link building tools which Shark SEO has reviewed. Finally It should be noted though that although more expensive per point, Raven allows the tracking of 1,000 keywords compared to SEOmoz’s 250.
Posted in Google, Industry Comment, Knowledge Base, Marketing, SEO | No Comments »